...For Three Muses, Theme Thursday, and Pointy Hats and Wings
Zetti
What makes a Zetti? We all know various components of Zetti, but how is it defined by its creators, Tracy and Teesha Moore? Am I correct that Teesha and Tracy invented all things Zetti? If not, then please set me straight. I'm really interested, not in a personal interpretation, but in the actual definition, and in how big a role personal interpretation plays in this, if at all. Why? I don't know why, must I have a reason? I just am. And not from a legalistic standpoint; more from curiosity.
At any rate, here's my Zetti, apparent in image, border and concept, but just what it is that makes these things "Zetti", I couldn't really say, at least not precisely.
Conceptual Art
I choose to illustrate concepts, not words or phrases. If I'm asked to illustrate "chair", for instance, I don't rush around looking for images of chairs, or draw a chair before I've internalized the concept and made it relevant to a part of my life. I don't find it necessary to explain the relevance, but I believe that you are more likely to find something in it that speaks to you, if something in it speaks to me. The meanings can be different for both of us, and are more meaningful if they're personal and individual. But for a piece of art to be relevant, the meaning must come from somewhere other than the observer's making it up on the fly, and while you probably won't see my story in it, hopefully you'll see something of yours. Not everyone works this way, nor should they, necessarily. It's just what I do.
Suffering
You can't study art without noticing how often the word "suffering" pops up, and in so many contexts. At some point or other, students always ask if suffering is a necessary component of creating art, and if so, why this is so. It depends on how you define suffering of course, and if your definition is ghetto poverty, then the answer is, no, it isn't necessary, in fact, it can be a hindrance, although it doesn't have to be.
But unless you're just mindlessly knocking off crafts, and hey, I'm not knocking this, it can be fun and relaxing, but in creating a piece of art, each piece has a growth cycle, and there's always some suffering involved in coming to grips with getting to know the piece and what it needs. There's a period of struggle, a push and a pull, sometimes even a fight, before you can move into the phase of peaceful execution. This type of suffering, like suffering in raising children, and working at relationships in general, carries with it an aspect of beauty and nobility.
If you separate the act of suffering, the work of it, from physical pain and the fear of death and failure, then you extract the beauty. This, simply stated, is the work of the heart. It's the added components of fear and physical pain that give suffering a bad name and conjure up the definitions that western society has saddled it with. Purely, it is in suffering that beauty is wrought, not the suffering of pain and fear, but the suffering of patience. The patience of listening and waiting, as long as it takes, for a creation to develop, working surgery when necessary to remove unwanted aspects and providing the necessary elements at the right times for growth. In Greek, "pathima".
Right now I'm:
Sitting in a public library at closing time
Getting ready to run the last few errands of the day, and
Wondering what to make for dinner.
Have a great day, Everyone!